What's Happening?
Important Dates
Did You Receive An N13 Eviction Notice?![]()
NewsThis morning, I was notified by email of an interim order issued by the LTB. To summarize the contents of this LTB order: It says that a number of the units in the building will have their N13 eviction applications rejected due to the landlord not paying compensation by the required deadline. For the rest of the tenants, there is no conclusion yet since we ran out of time at the May 26th hearing. Additional testimony on the merits of these N13 applications will be heard at a future hearing that has not been scheduled yet.
The order contains the following noteworthy statements show below "in quotes". I have redacted some specific information using [in brackets] below: "1. This interim order is issued to decide the Tenants’ preliminary motion to dismiss some of the applications. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted." "39.The Landlord has not proved, on a balance of probabilities, that it paid compensation in respect of the [various dates] units by those deadlines. It paid [a tenant] compensation for unit [unit number] on [date], which was after the deadline. It has not proved that it paid the other [multiple units] at all." "47.The applications against the [multiple units] with termination dates of [various dates] will be dismissed." "It is ordered that: 1. The following applications are dismissed: [multiple units] 3. The following applications are adjourned to be heard together on a date to be set by the LTB: [most of the remaining tenants]" In relation to questions that several tenants asked me about my testimony regarding insertion of documents into mail slots, the interim order from the LTB contains several statements that further explain the significance and relevance of testimony (such as the testimony that I provided) regarding insertion of mail into mail slots: "35. The Landlord proposes an alternate explanation for [tenant's] testimony. It suggests that perhaps [landlord's rep] delivered the payment on time, but did not put it all the way into the mail slot. Perhaps the envelope fell out into the hallway, where somebody picked it up and returned it to [landlord's rep]." "36. The Landlord’s theory is farfetched, but even if true it would not assist the Landlord. If [landlord's rep] had only delivered the payments partway through the mail slots, such that some of them fell out and were returned to his office, then it would be impossible for the Landlord to prove which payments, if any, had actually been delivered to the Tenants." Today, a tenant asked me to explain why I provided the additional testimony about delivery of notices and cheques at the tenant board hearing on Monday. My reasoning behind providing this testimony was to provide the LTB with additional grounds for rejecting N13 applications where improper service of documents occurred (such as in the case of compensation cheques).
The LTB has rules that must be followed for serving documents: How to Serve a Landlord or Tenant with Documents On the LTB's web site, it says " Consequences of not serving or not serving correctlyIf you don’t serve a document that you were required to, it is possible that your application or motion will be dismissed. If you serve a document using a method that is not permitted, you may be required to prove at the hearing when and how the other party received the document" Reading further, it says "More Methods of Service [...] Person or organization you are serving [...] Tenant, subtenant, or occupant of the rental unit or a co-op member [...] Place the documents under the door of the unit or put them through the mail slot in the door of the unit (as long as the person is still in possession of the unit.)" elsewhere on the page, it says "by leaving it at the place where mail is ordinarily delivered to the person" In my personal experience, the mail courier who ordinarily delivers mail is always able to fully insert mail through out mail slots. However, also in my experience, this landlord has a habit of improperly inserting documents into mail slots in such a way that they are likely to fall out and get lost without the tenant's knowledge, which supports the idea that improper service of documents may have occurred. Furthermore, any applications for eviction orders that rely on improperly served documents should thus be rejected. Today, I attended my N13 merits hearing. Several witnesses were called upon and cross-examined to discuss the merits of the proposed 'extensive renovations'. Various facts about the proposed plumbing work and the state of the building was presented. The day ended just before an additional witness was to be called upon to testify in relation to the proposed plumbing work. An additional hearing is anticipated some time in the future, but nothing has been scheduled yet.
According to these Instagram posts by acornontario, the tenants at '94 beck' and '201 & 195 lindsay street' (also Michael Klein properties) won their cases at the LTB:
201 & 195 Lindsay Street 94 Beck This morning, I received a notice from the Landlord and Tenant Board of Ontario, that my next L2 merits hearing will be scheduled for May 26, 2025.
On February 5th, 2025, the following letter was placed in my mail slot:
![]() The letter states that there was a 'change in building management', however the name listed for the site manager appears to be the same as what is was previously. In addition, a new name is listed for the superintendent. Several days later, I spoke with someone in the hallway who was cleaning. I asked them if the building owner changed, and they said it was still the same owner. Continue To Page 2 >>> Past Dates
|
![]() This web page was created, managed, and hosted by current resident Robert Elder, a 7-year tenant of 250 Frederick.
|